§ 01
Overview
Module 2.3: Algebraic Reasoning
What Algebraic Reasoning Means on This Test
The algebraic reasoning section of the STEM Thinking Skills Assessment is not your Algebra I final exam. You won't be solving 30 equations for x or factoring trinomials. Instead, this section tests whether you can think mathematically --- whether you can see patterns, reason through relationships, translate real-world situations into mathematical structures, and figure out the answer even when the path isn't obvious.
The minimum prerequisite for ACL applicants is enrollment in Algebra I or higher, so the test assumes you have that foundation. You should be comfortable with variables, equations, inequalities, functions, and basic graphing. But the questions go beyond routine computation. They test reasoning, not calculation --- which is also why calculators aren't allowed. The math itself isn't computationally heavy. The thinking is what's hard.
This module will walk through the major types of algebraic reasoning you'll encounter, with concrete examples and strategies for each.
Skill 1: Pattern Recognition and Sequence Completion
Pattern questions give you a sequence of numbers, shapes, or symbols and ask you to figure out the rule and predict what comes next (or what goes in a missing position).
Example 1: Numerical sequence
What comes next? 2, 6, 18, 54, ___
Look at the relationship between consecutive terms:
-
2 to 6: multiply by 3
-
6 to 18: multiply by 3
-
18 to 54: multiply by 3
The pattern is geometric (multiply by 3 each time). The next term is 54 x 3 = 162.
That one's straightforward. The test will be trickier.
Example 2: Two-operation pattern
What comes next? 3, 5, 10, 12, 24, 26, ___
This alternates between two operations:
-
3 to 5: add 2
-
5 to 10: multiply by 2
-
10 to 12: add 2
-
12 to 24: multiply by 2
-
24 to 26: add 2
-
26 to ___: multiply by 2
The next term is 26 x 2 = 52.
Example 3: Position-based pattern
The nth term of a sequence is defined by: first term is 1, and each subsequent term equals the previous term plus n.
-
Term 1: 1
-
Term 2: 1 + 2 = 3
-
Term 3: 3 + 3 = 6
-
Term 4: 6 + 4 = 10
-
Term 5: 10 + 5 = 15
What is Term 8?
Continue the pattern: Term 6 = 15 + 6 = 21, Term 7 = 21 + 7 = 28, Term 8 = 28 + 8 = 36.
(You might recognize these as triangular numbers --- but you don't need to know that name to solve the problem.)
Strategy for pattern questions:
-
Look at the differences between consecutive terms first. Are they constant (arithmetic sequence)? Are they growing by a constant ratio (geometric)? Are they following their own pattern?
-
If first differences don't reveal a clear pattern, look at second differences (the differences of the differences).
-
Consider whether two operations are alternating.
-
Check whether the pattern involves the position number itself (1st term, 2nd term, etc.).
Skill 2: Algebraic Expressions and Equation Manipulation
These questions test whether you can work with variables fluently --- simplifying, substituting, and rearranging expressions.
Example 1: Substitution and simplification
If a = 3 and b = -2, what is the value of 2a^2 - 3ab + b^2?
Work through it step by step:
-
2a^2 = 2(3)^2 = 2(9) = 18
-
3ab = 3(3)(-2) = -18, so -3ab = -(-18) = 18
-
b^2 = (-2)^2 = 4
Total: 18 + 18 + 4 = 40
Watch the signs carefully. The most common mistakes on substitution problems come from sign errors, especially when substituting negative numbers. Remember: (-2)^2 = 4, but -(2^2) = -4. Parentheses matter enormously.
Example 2: Rearranging an equation
The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is P = 2l + 2w. Solve for w.
-
P = 2l + 2w
-
P - 2l = 2w
-
w = (P - 2l) / 2
This is a routine skill, but under time pressure and without a calculator, students sometimes make errors. Practice doing these manipulations cleanly.
Example 3: Working with inequalities
If 3x - 7 > 14, which values of x are in the solution set?
-
3x > 21
-
x > 7
Any value greater than 7 works. Remember the critical rule: when you multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign flips. This won't always show up, but when it does, it's a common trap.
Skill 3: Word Problems Requiring Algebraic Translation
These are the questions that test whether you can take a real-world scenario described in English and convert it into mathematical expressions or equations. Translation is the skill --- the actual solving is usually straightforward once you've set it up.
Example 1:
"A movie theater charges 8 for child tickets. On Saturday, the theater sold 150 tickets and collected $1,500. How many adult tickets were sold?"
Set up the equations:
-
Let a = adult tickets, c = child tickets
-
a + c = 150 (total tickets)
-
12a + 8c = 1,500 (total revenue)
From the first equation: c = 150 - a
Substitute into the second: 12a + 8(150 - a) = 1,500
12a + 1,200 - 8a = 1,500
4a = 300
a = 75
Example 2:
"Maya is 4 years older than twice her brother's age. If Maya is 22, how old is her brother?"
Translate the relationship: Maya's age = 2(brother's age) + 4
22 = 2b + 4
18 = 2b
b = 9
The translation process:
-
Identify what you're solving for and assign it a variable.
-
Read each sentence and convert the English into math. "Is" usually means "=". "More than" means "+". "Times" means "x". "Less than" means "-" (but watch the order --- "5 less than x" is x - 5, not 5 - x).
-
Write the equation, then solve.
-
Check your answer by plugging it back into the original word problem. Does it make sense?
Skill 4: Systems of Relationships
This is where the STEM Thinking Skills Assessment gets interesting. Instead of standard "solve the system" problems, you may encounter questions that give you a set of relationships and constraints and ask you to reason through them.
Example 1: Logic constraints
"Four students --- Alex, Bailey, Casey, and Dana --- each scored a different score on a test. We know:
-
Alex scored higher than Bailey.
-
Casey scored higher than Alex.
-
Dana scored lower than Bailey."
Rank the students from highest to lowest score.
Work through the constraints one at a time:
-
Alex > Bailey
-
Casey > Alex, so Casey > Alex > Bailey
-
Dana < Bailey, so Casey > Alex > Bailey > Dana
Answer: Casey, Alex, Bailey, Dana
Example 2: Quantitative constraints
"Three boxes contain a total of 30 items. Box A has twice as many items as Box B. Box C has 3 more items than Box B."
How many items are in each box?
Let Box B = b
-
Box A = 2b
-
Box C = b + 3
-
Total: b + 2b + (b + 3) = 30
-
4b + 3 = 30
-
4b = 27
-
b = 6.75
Wait --- that's not a whole number. On a multiple choice test, this might signal that you've misread the problem. But if the answer choices include non-integers, then 6.75 is correct and Box B = 6.75, Box A = 13.5, Box C = 9.75.
However, if the problem says "items" (implying whole numbers), double-check your setup. This kind of self-checking is exactly the reasoning the test rewards.
Example 3: Balancing relationships
"On a balance scale, 2 circles weigh the same as 3 triangles. 1 triangle weighs the same as 4 squares. How many squares weigh the same as 1 circle?"
Build the chain:
-
2 circles = 3 triangles, so 1 circle = 1.5 triangles
-
1 triangle = 4 squares
-
1 circle = 1.5 triangles = 1.5 x 4 squares = 6 squares
These problems reward systematic thinking. Write out each relationship, substitute step by step, and don't try to do it all in your head.
Skill 5: Non-Standard Problem Types
The STEM Thinking Skills Assessment includes problems that don't fit neatly into standard Algebra I categories. These test mathematical thinking and flexibility.
Working Backwards
"After a number is doubled, then increased by 5, the result is 31. What was the original number?"
Work backwards from 31:
-
Before adding 5: 31 - 5 = 26
-
Before doubling: 26 / 2 = 13
Check: 13 x 2 = 26, 26 + 5 = 31. Correct.
Working backwards is powerful when the problem describes a sequence of operations and gives you the final result. Instead of setting up an equation (which also works), just reverse each step.
Estimation and Reasonableness
"Without calculating exactly, which of the following is closest to 4.97 x 19.8?"
Round to friendly numbers: 5 x 20 = 100. The answer is closest to 100.
The test may also ask you to determine whether an answer is reasonable. If a problem asks for a student's age and your calculation gives you 147, something went wrong.
Eliminating Answer Choices
This is a powerful strategy for multiple choice tests. Sometimes you can eliminate answers without fully solving the problem.
"If n is an odd number, which of the following must also be odd?"
A) n + 1
B) 2n
C) n^2
D) n - 3
Think about each one:
-
n + 1: odd + 1 = even. Eliminate.
-
2n: 2 times anything is even. Eliminate.
-
n^2: odd x odd = odd. Keep.
-
n - 3: odd - odd = even. Eliminate.
Answer: C. You didn't need to plug in numbers or do complex reasoning --- just apply basic properties of odd and even numbers.
Testing answer choices (backsolving)
When a problem is hard to set up algebraically, try plugging in the answer choices and seeing which one works.
"A farmer has chickens and cows. She counts 20 heads and 56 legs. How many chickens does she have?"
A) 8 B) 10 C) 12 D) 14
Try C (12 chickens):
-
12 chickens = 12 heads, 24 legs
-
Remaining heads: 20 - 12 = 8 cows
-
8 cows = 32 legs
-
Total legs: 24 + 32 = 56. That matches.
Answer: C. Backsolving is especially useful when setting up the equation would be time-consuming and the answer choices are easy to test.
Practice Section
Problem 1:
What is the next number in the sequence? 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, ___
Solution: Each number is the sum of the two preceding numbers (this is the Fibonacci sequence). 8 + 13 = 21.
Problem 2:
A store sells pencils for 0.75 each. If you buy a total of 20 items and spend exactly $12.50, how many pencils did you buy?
Let p = pencils, e = erasers.
-
p + e = 20, so e = 20 - p
-
0.50p + 0.75e = 12.50
-
0.50p + 0.75(20 - p) = 12.50
-
0.50p + 15 - 0.75p = 12.50
-
-0.25p = -2.50
-
p = 10
Check: 10 pencils (7.50) = $12.50. Correct.
Problem 3:
If 5 workers can paint a fence in 8 hours, how long would it take 4 workers to paint the same fence (assuming all workers paint at the same rate)?
Total work = 5 workers x 8 hours = 40 worker-hours.
With 4 workers: 40 / 4 = 10 hours.
Problem 4:
A number is multiplied by 3, then 7 is subtracted, then the result is divided by 2. The final answer is 10. What was the original number?
Work backwards:
-
Before dividing by 2: 10 x 2 = 20
-
Before subtracting 7: 20 + 7 = 27
-
Before multiplying by 3: 27 / 3 = 9
Check: 9 x 3 = 27, 27 - 7 = 20, 20 / 2 = 10. Correct.
Problem 5:
In a class of 30 students, the ratio of students who prefer math to students who prefer science is 3:2. How many students prefer math?
Total ratio parts: 3 + 2 = 5.
Each part represents: 30 / 5 = 6 students.
Math: 3 x 6 = 18 students.
Problem 6:
On a balance scale, 3 stars weigh the same as 2 moons. 4 moons weigh the same as 5 suns. How many suns weigh the same as 6 stars?
Build the chain:
-
3 stars = 2 moons, so 1 star = 2/3 moon
-
6 stars = 6 x (2/3) moons = 4 moons
-
4 moons = 5 suns
-
So 6 stars = 5 suns
Building Your Algebraic Reasoning Skills
Strengthen your mental math. Since calculators aren't allowed, practice doing arithmetic in your head. Multiply two-digit numbers, work with fractions, estimate products and quotients. Five minutes a day of mental math practice will make a noticeable difference.
Practice translating words to math. Take real-world situations you encounter --- prices at a store, distances on a trip, time needed to complete tasks --- and express them as equations. The better you get at translating, the faster you'll move through word problems on the test.
Always check your work. On a multiple choice test, you have a powerful advantage: you can verify your answer by plugging it back in. If you have time, always do this. It catches sign errors, arithmetic mistakes, and misread problems.
Don't get stuck on one problem. If a question has you going in circles after 60-90 seconds, pick your best guess (use elimination to improve your odds), mark it mentally, and move on. Come back to it if you have time at the end. One hard question is not worth sacrificing two easy ones.
Learn to recognize problem types. The more you practice, the faster you'll identify whether a problem calls for pattern recognition, translation, backsolving, working backwards, or constraint reasoning. This recognition alone saves valuable time on a timed test.
